Appealing Chart or Engaging Chart?: An Analysis
This area chart illustrates the proportion of every generation in the US Congress from the year 1920 to 2020. Despite being visually pleasing, informative, and interactive from the first look, this chart can confuse its viewers with convoluted details and unclear size assessment.
The chart stands out with its creative layout. There is a selection of clearly distinguished colours that help users to easily differentiate the data subjects. Each generation has its share properly drawn in the chart. This complicated dataset is arranged quite neatly in only one visualization, which makes the chart comprehensive and time-saving for its users.
The captivating illustration, however, does not so succeed in its required function. It is packed with too many details, such as different colours, shapes, and a long time range. Such attributes overwhelm the viewers with a huge amount of information to process. Questions then arise. Should the users focus on the size of each colour? Or should they focus on the span of them through time? It takes the users much time to figure out how to interpret the data when they first interact with it.
Though the purpose of this visualization is to highlight the proportion of baby boomers in the US Congress nowadays (as it shows in the headline), this core generation only makes up a smaller portion on the right side of the chart. The rest of the chart only seems distracting and redundant. To better present the data, the creator could turn this visualization into a line chart, which is mostly used to compare data over a time range.
The efficiency of the hovering feature is not as good as it seems. This feature lacks continuity when the users jump from one area to another to see the share of Congress members in a particular year. The vertical line only shows the information of that particular area, which does not have any comparison value. It is better to have the hovering feature showing data of every generation in the year chosen.
As appealing and creative as the data visualization is, it still need some improvement to do.
Link to the chart:
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/aging-congress-boomers/.png)
.png)
.jpg)
Hi Leslie, this is an interesting chart, I've never seen one like this before. I do agree one of its major faults is how hard it is to see which categories are larger than the other. The colours are nice and contrasting against the other which is nice to differentiate the birth ranges.
ReplyDeleteThe chart does stand out because of how colourful it is, and then immediately confused me while trying to interpret it. I appreciate that you very clearly identified this as an issue with this data visualization, and I agree that a line chart would be a much better option. I also like that you really dug into how challenging interactive features can be, more often than not, I find them to be more trouble than they are worth!
ReplyDeleteOne small suggestion: when linking to the original source, embedding the link into the text of your written analysis would be a bit more polished.
This chart's visually pleasing and informative aspects, such as the use of clear colors and the comprehensive representation of complex data. However, your critique of the chart's potential to confuse viewers due to its intricate details and unclear size assessment is valid.And I agree your suggest transform the visualization into a line chart to better present the data .Well done!
ReplyDelete